A plain tar.gz archive should be made available for downloading and packaging for Linux/*NIX

[morancj]

Please make a (signed, with checksums) .tar.gz or similar archive available for Linux/*NIX distributions instead of (or, at least, as well as) the command-line installer. I have several reasons for requesting this:

1. Maintenance of an installation script is error-prone and time-consuming.
2. Many distributions (or O/S) have different ways of packaging software for clean installation and removal. Package maintainers are the experts.
3. It avoids trouble with sudo pip, clobbering PyPI with download requests, large Docker images and the associated complexity of passing through user data from the host. A Docker image I built FROM ubuntu:18.04 was 185MB. The Arch package is 69MB.
4. Predicatable version installation. For example, the download URL returns 2.0.0dev3: a few days ago, it was giving 2.0.0dev2.
5. A clear view of dependencies: for example, the Ubuntu image mentioned previously needs groff and less persistently installed in order to use the help commands.

As an example, when packaging your code for Arch Linux, I've had to run operations like this:

package() {
  ./aws/install -i "${pkgdir}/opt/${pkgname}" -b "${pkgdir}/tmp"
  rm -fr "${pkgdir}/tmp"
  cd "${pkgdir}"
  mkdir -p "${pkgdir}/usr/bin"
  ln -s "/opt/${pkgname}/v2/current/bin/aws2" "${pkgdir}/usr/bin/aws2"
  ln -s "/opt/${pkgname}/v2/current/bin/aws2_completer" "${pkgdir}/usr/bin/aws2_completer"
  cd "${pkgdir}/opt/aws-cli-v2/v2"
  rm -fr "${pkgdir}/opt/aws-cli-v2/v2/current"
  ln -s "${pkgver}" "${pkgdir}/opt/aws-cli-v2/v2/current"
}

You can see how I have to remove your symlinks and re-create them in the fakeroot to get correct paths.

Please see similar arguments e.g. here and various other places around the WWW.

[morancj]

Largely for the purpose of illustrating this issue, I've put my Arch package source (forked from the AUR) and Dockerfile up on GitHub here.

[morancj]

This also references #4660, and relates to #3553, #4278, #4175, #4926, #4942.

[kyleknap]

Marking as a feature request. Creating a source distribution that will allow users to build the CLI v2 themselves is something want to do.

[kdaily]

@morancj,

There is now a proposal for a source distribution of the AWS CLI v2 that should satisfy use cases outlined here:

#6352

We'd appreciate any feedback you have on it. Thanks!

[github-actions]

Greetings! It looks like this issue hasn’t been active in longer than five days. We encourage you to check if this is still an issue in the latest release. In the absence of more information, we will be closing this issue soon. If you find that this is still a problem, please feel free to provide a comment or upvote with a reaction on the initial post to prevent automatic closure. If the issue is already closed, please feel free to open a new one.

[morancj]

Thanks! I hit a couple of build problems, probably some missing dependencies in my chroot. In principle, this is way more than I asked for or expected, thanks for all the hard work @kyleknap & the ping @kdaily!

[FearlessHyena]

Hi just wanted to check if there were plans of releasing a tar.gz (or Linux standard) version of the archive as mentioned in #6339 as well