Use Record type in place of Object #557
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
trivikr
changed the title
trivikr
changed the title
AllanZhengYP
approved these changes
Jun 2, 2022
srchase
pushed a commit
to srchase/smithy-typescript
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2023
* Use Record type instead Object type * Update protocol-test-form-urlencoded-stub.ts * Change Object -> Record in doc
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue #, if available:
Internal JS-3299
Description of changes:
Use Record type instead Object type.
Searched for regular expression
\{ \[key: string\]: ([^ ]*) \}and replacing it withRecord<string, $1>By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.