Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add exclude/include tranforms using selectors #1534

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2023

Conversation

sugmanue
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes:

Added include/exclude transforms using selectors. Using selectors is a generic way to include or exclude shapes, instead of adding specific transforms such as byShapeType (e.g., this PR) a selector can be used to replace that and other use cases.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@sugmanue sugmanue requested a review from a team as a code owner December 13, 2022 00:43
@sugmanue sugmanue force-pushed the tranform-by-selector branch from b642db0 to 0a389fe Compare December 13, 2022 03:31
@@ -298,6 +298,49 @@ Only the following shape type changes are supported:
}


.. _excludeShapesBySelector-transform:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing the port to 2.0 docs.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤦 I'll fix that, it should only be for the 2.0 docs.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated, thanks!

@sugmanue sugmanue force-pushed the tranform-by-selector branch from 0a389fe to 9f18b76 Compare December 13, 2022 21:07
@sugmanue sugmanue force-pushed the tranform-by-selector branch from 9f18b76 to 1183be3 Compare December 13, 2022 21:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants