Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(builtin): include optionalDependencies in strictly visible packages #2657

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 7, 2021

Conversation

alexeagle
Copy link
Collaborator

These are identical to regular dependencies except that a failure to install them is non-fatal.
They should be visible as Bazel dependencies.

Note I didn't include peerDependencies here still. These are an indication that some consumer should install the package, and that results in a bazel-visible dependency, so I think that's working correctly

These are identical to regular dependencies except that a failure to install them is non-fatal.
They should be visible as Bazel dependencies.

Note I didn't include peerDependencies here still. These are an indication that some consumer should install the package, and that results in a bazel-visible dependency, so I think that's working correctly
@alexeagle alexeagle merged commit 2a1ed31 into bazel-contrib:stable May 7, 2021
twheys pushed a commit to twheys/rules_nodejs that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2022
…es (bazel-contrib#2657)

These are identical to regular dependencies except that a failure to install them is non-fatal.
They should be visible as Bazel dependencies.

Note I didn't include peerDependencies here still. These are an indication that some consumer should install the package, and that results in a bazel-visible dependency, so I think that's working correctly
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants