Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better differentiate between optional and required parameters #390

Closed
scott-taubman opened this issue Mar 2, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #411
Closed

Better differentiate between optional and required parameters #390

scott-taubman opened this issue Mar 2, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #411
Assignees
Labels
feature New feature or request user request Originated from a user request

Comments

@scott-taubman
Copy link
Contributor

Currently there is not as much of a distinction between optional and required parameters as there was in the old UI. There is a small "*" listed on required fields, but they are listed inline with all of the required parameters. In the old UI there was a complete separation via different tabs for required and optional parameters. This was preferred by some users because it meant that for some commands where the optional parameters might be considered "advanced" options that most users shouldn't fiddle with, they were kind of out of sight and out of mind. As where in this new iteration they are all equally prominently displayed and it's easy to miss the distinction between them.

If we could separate the parameters out with tabs or something similar like the old UI did that would be great. Failing that, we need some other means of more clearly differentiating and grouping the optional and required parameters.

@scott-taubman scott-taubman added feature New feature or request user request Originated from a user request labels Mar 2, 2023
@west270 west270 self-assigned this Mar 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request user request Originated from a user request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants