Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"_Or_" for keybind selection filters #2581

Closed
Hazy-uhyR opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

"_Or_" for keybind selection filters #2581

Hazy-uhyR opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Hazy-uhyR
Copy link
Contributor

Hazy-uhyR commented Feb 5, 2024

Description

Right now, when doing selection filters for keybind, all the filters need to be true for something for it to be added to the selection. It would be nice if we could have Or between filters, rather than the forced _And_s "that are there" now.

I am not sure how to do something like "(filter 1 and filter 2) OR (filter 3 and filter 4)", but that stuff could be useful too, maybe. Simple Ors between filters would be nice, for now.

Why?

This would make it possible to create specific filter combos for selecting, for instance: all fighters, all specific kinds of infantry bots, etc. Right now, that is not really possible, unless the weapon ranges of those units somehow match up, and doesn't happen to include stuff outside of what you actually want to filter for.

What area of the game does this feature request pertain?

Settings, Controls or Hotkeys

Other (optional)

No response

@Hazy-uhyR Hazy-uhyR added the Enhancement New feature or request label Feb 5, 2024
@Hazy-uhyR Hazy-uhyR changed the title "_OR_" for keybind selection filters "_Or_" for keybind selection filters Feb 10, 2024
@thehobojoe
Copy link
Contributor

Already implemented in engine (temporary rollbacks notwithstanding)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants