You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since I fixed issue #24 of monoid-subclasses, the containers' Map and IntMap instances have become less useful. I considered adding instances for MonoidalMap in their place, but monoidal-containers has become a heavy dependency since its addition of aeson.
As an alternative, I wonder if you'd be open to a PR adding the monoid-subclasses as a dependency and the relevant instances? It would bring in only one transitive dependency, namely primes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
-1 from me. monoid-subclasses seems to be a lot more progressive than monoidal-containers where its sole purpose is to provide a different definition of the Semigroup instance, so I think it should be the other way around.
I believe the plan is to switch to indexed-traversable, which reduces the dependency footprint a lot
Since I fixed issue #24 of monoid-subclasses, the containers'
Map
andIntMap
instances have become less useful. I considered adding instances forMonoidalMap
in their place, butmonoidal-containers
has become a heavy dependency since its addition ofaeson
.As an alternative, I wonder if you'd be open to a PR adding the
monoid-subclasses
as a dependency and the relevant instances? It would bring in only one transitive dependency, namelyprimes
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: