Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify that a rawdata directory is not a prescription #1519

Closed
sappelhoff opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1741
Closed

Clarify that a rawdata directory is not a prescription #1519

sappelhoff opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1741
Assignees
Labels
consistency Spec is (potentially) inconsistent

Comments

@sappelhoff
Copy link
Member

In this example, where `sourcedata` and `derivatives` are not nested inside
`rawdata`, **only the `rawdata` subdirectory** needs to be a BIDS-compliant
dataset.

although this sentence might make it seem as if it were. (re: discussion at sprint)

@effigies
Copy link
Collaborator

I suppose we could just add

(Note that rawdata here is an arbitrarily-chosen name. BIDS specifies the contents of a dataset, not the names of directories containing datasets.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment