You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In thinking about appropriate definitions of orientation coordinates for DWI derivatives, I realised that in its current form the main BIDS spec makes the same mistake that we made in MRtrix3 regarding the definition of the FSL bvecs / bvals format.
Inherent to the FSL format for bvec specification is the fact that the coordinate system of the bvecs is with respect to the participant (i.e., defined by the axes of the corresponding dwi.nii file) and not the magnet’s coordinate system
This is not precisely correct. The vector orientations defined in the bvecs file are with respect to the i,j,k axes of the corresponding NIfTI image as though the NIfTI were to use a neurological convention. That is: regardless of whether the associated NIfTI image is LAS (Analyze heritage; negative transform determinant) or RAS (NIfTI spec), the bvecs directions are with reference to the LAS equivalent of that NIfTI image.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In thinking about appropriate definitions of orientation coordinates for DWI derivatives, I realised that in its current form the main BIDS spec makes the same mistake that we made in MRtrix3 regarding the definition of the FSL
bvecs
/bvals
format.The best explanation of the issue was posted on our community forum; the FSL FDT documentation has also since been updated accordingly.
Long story short
The current description is:
This is not precisely correct. The vector orientations defined in the
bvecs
file are with respect to the i,j,k axes of the corresponding NIfTI image as though the NIfTI were to use a neurological convention. That is: regardless of whether the associated NIfTI image is LAS (Analyze heritage; negative transform determinant) or RAS (NIfTI spec), thebvecs
directions are with reference to the LAS equivalent of that NIfTI image.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: