Validator: For contrasts, the number of weights should be equal the number of conditions

[Remi-Gau]

The following should be invalid

      "Contrasts": [
        {
          "Name": "incongruent_vs_congruent",
          "ConditionList": ["incongruent", "congruent"],
          "Weights": [1, -1, 1],
          "Test": "t"
        }
      ]

[effigies]

I don't know if we can impose this in general, since x_* would mean we don't know the number of conditions to check against. But in general I agree. Is it possible to do this in JSON validation or would it be purely in Python?

QQ: For F tests, I believe it's the case that the columns are supposed to match number of conditions, right? And is it the case that nrows <= ncols?

[Remi-Gau]

I don't know if we can impose this in general, since x_* would mean we don't know the number of conditions to check against.

true: to a certain extend the fine detail would have to be done on the implementation side, but in any case one would need to know what weight to give each condition so even for a globbing parttern there should something that will be applied for all conditions that would result from it.

But in general I agree. Is it possible to do this in JSON validation or would it be purely in Python?

No idea.

QQ: For F tests, I believe it's the case that the columns are supposed to match number of conditions, right?

yup

And is it the case that nrows <= ncols?

yup