You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Due to strong presence of per-batch/plate patterns in cell count (CC) visualizations (#7), we wanted to look if cell count variability has a relationship with position effect retrievability metrics (#9). To do so, we added Metadata_Count_Cells column to metadata (from jump-cellpainting/morphmap@dbbd1c3) and calculated it's coefficient of variation (CoV). We then empirically chose a cutoff value of CoV=0.12 to split ORF into low and high CC variability.
Cell counts
Cell count CoV
Cell counts split @ CoV=0.12
2. Subsetting same ORF, same well mAP based on low vs high cell count variability
Based on low/high variability, we can select ORFs from the subset that we used to calculate mAP for raw and baseline-corrected data (see #9). Due to low number of samples in same ORF, different well and same well, different ORF, it makes sense to look at same ORF, same well. Columns are the same as in #9:
"subset": a subset of raw uncorrected data
"subset->correct": a subset of raw profiles that were then corrected by subtracting per-well mean on this subset
"correct->subset": a subset of corrected profiles, which were corrected by subtracting per-well mean on full data
2.1 Low cell count variability ORFs
Setting
Data
mmAP
Percent retrieved (p<0.05)
same well, same ORF
raw
0.231
0.969 (2519/2600)
same well, same ORF
subset->correct
0.177
0.816 (2121/2600)
same well, same ORF
correct->subset
0.242
0.7 (1821/2600)
Low CC CoV visualization
2.2 High cell count variability ORFs
Setting
Data
mmAP
Percent retrieved (p<0.05)
same well, same ORF
raw
0.113
0.737 (776/1053)
same well, same ORF
subset->correct
0.134
0.674 (710/1053)
same well, same ORF
correct->subset
0.245
0.644 (678/1053)
High CC CoV visualization
Metrics on uncorrected data differ substantially between low and high variability subsets. Per-well mean subtraction reduces this difference.
3. Visualizing distributional relationships between mAP and cell count variability (all ORFs)
Instead of splitting ORFs into low/high variability, we can also plot all their mAPs vs CoVs. There are very few ORFs that have both high cell count variability and mAP values/significance.
mAPs vs CoVs color-coded by p-values
CoVs vs p-values color-coded by mAP values
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
1. Exploring cell count variability
Due to strong presence of per-batch/plate patterns in cell count (CC) visualizations (#7), we wanted to look if cell count variability has a relationship with position effect retrievability metrics (#9). To do so, we added
Metadata_Count_Cells
column to metadata (from jump-cellpainting/morphmap@dbbd1c3) and calculated it's coefficient of variation (CoV). We then empirically chose a cutoff value ofCoV=0.12
to split ORF into low and high CC variability.2. Subsetting
same ORF, same well
mAP based on low vs high cell count variabilityBased on low/high variability, we can select ORFs from the subset that we used to calculate mAP for raw and baseline-corrected data (see #9). Due to low number of samples in
same ORF, different well
andsame well, different ORF
, it makes sense to look atsame ORF, same well
. Columns are the same as in #9:2.1 Low cell count variability ORFs
Low CC CoV visualization
2.2 High cell count variability ORFs
High CC CoV visualization
Metrics on uncorrected data differ substantially between low and high variability subsets. Per-well mean subtraction reduces this difference.
2.3 All ORFs
For the reference, results for from #9
3. Visualizing distributional relationships between mAP and cell count variability (all ORFs)
Instead of splitting ORFs into low/high variability, we can also plot all their mAPs vs CoVs. There are very few ORFs that have both high cell count variability and mAP values/significance.
mAPs vs CoVs color-coded by p-values
CoVs vs p-values color-coded by mAP values
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: