Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WebTransport support via quic-go #5421

Closed
MonkeyBrothers opened this issue Mar 7, 2023 · 17 comments
Closed

WebTransport support via quic-go #5421

MonkeyBrothers opened this issue Mar 7, 2023 · 17 comments
Labels
deferred ⏰ We'll come back to this later needs info 📭 Requires more information upstream ⬆️ Relates to some dependency of this project

Comments

@MonkeyBrothers
Copy link

hello,I have been using webtransport(base quic-go) recently to transfer some data.
I want to use caddy as my proxy forwarding, but I tried the following configuration is not feasible.

Caddyfile:

{
      debug
}
webtransport.xxx.com {
      tls 2507511047@qq.com
      reverse_proxy 10.176.237.64:9001 
}

docker-compse.yml:

version: "3.9"
services:
  caddy:
    image: caddy
    restart: unless-stopped
    network_mode: "host"
    ports:
      - "80:80"
      - "443:443"
      - "443:443/udp"
    volumes:
      - ./data:/data
      - ./config:/config
      - ./Caddyfile:/etc/caddy/Caddyfile
    logging:
      driver: "json-file"
      options:
        max-size: "500m"
        max-file: "3"

Access error:

Failed to establish a connection to https://webtransport.xxx.com: net::ERR_METHOD_NOT_SUPPORTED

need help

How should I configure to support the forward quic protocol?

@francislavoie
Copy link
Member

What do you see in Caddy's logs when you try to connect?

I don't know much about WebTransport so I'm not sure I'll be much help.

@francislavoie francislavoie added the needs info 📭 Requires more information label Mar 7, 2023
@francislavoie francislavoie changed the title net::ERR_METHOD_NOT_SUPPORTED WebTransport support via quic-go Mar 7, 2023
@francislavoie
Copy link
Member

@marten-seemann do you have any insight on if we're missing anything to allow this to work?

@MonkeyBrothers
Copy link
Author

@francislavoie

When I accessed it, I could see the following log.

image

I was able to transfer data locally when using the webtransport mode.
It is also possible to transfer data without using the caddy agent on the server.

@marten-seemann
Copy link
Contributor

How does the setup look like? You're running Caddy on the reserve proxy, and webtransport-go on both endpoints?
I assume that proxying the Extended CONNECT request is not a problem, since that's just a normal HTTP request (with some not so normal header fields).

But how would streams opened on the WebTransport session make it through the reverse proxy?

@MonkeyBrothers
Copy link
Author

MonkeyBrothers commented Mar 7, 2023

webtransport-go(port:9001) and caddy(port:443) are on a machine. I want to forward traffic to my webtransport-go through caddy's port 443.

I use HTML5 to connect my server.

webtransport-go(port:9001) and caddy(port:443) are on a machine.
I want to forward traffic to my webtransport-go through caddy's port 443.

I use HTML5 to connect my server.

const url = 'https://webtransport.xueche.com/test';
transport = new WebTransport(url);
transport.closed.then(() => {
    console.log(`The HTTP/3 connection to ${url} closed gracefully.`);
}).catch((error) => {
    console.error('The HTTP/3 connection to ${url} closed due to ${error}.');
});
await transport.ready;

@marten-seemann
Copy link
Contributor

That can't work. As long as Caddy isn't aware of WebTransport, it won't be able to make sense of WebTransport streams.

@francislavoie
Copy link
Member

@marten-seemann so I guess this isn't possible until #5086 is done?

@MonkeyBrothers
Copy link
Author

That can't work. As long as Caddy isn't aware of WebTransport, it won't be able to make sense of WebTransport streams.

I can understand that it doesn't support webtransport-go, but does it support h3?
I seem to be able to access it when I use h3.

@marten-seemann
Copy link
Contributor

@marten-seemann so I guess this isn't possible until #5086 is done?

That would be a prerequisite. If proxying HTTP/3 doesn't even work, the Extended CONNECT request won't even make it through.

I don't think that's all though. If you want to proxy WebTransport, your proxy needs to be WebTransport-aware.

@francislavoie
Copy link
Member

Okay, thanks. I'll close this issue for now in favour of that one, and WebTransport support can be looked into later on with that in mind.

@francislavoie francislavoie closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 7, 2023
@francislavoie francislavoie added deferred ⏰ We'll come back to this later upstream ⬆️ Relates to some dependency of this project needs info 📭 Requires more information and removed needs info 📭 Requires more information labels Mar 7, 2023
@francislavoie
Copy link
Member

Although what might work is https://github.com/mholt/caddy-l4 which could terminate TLS and then proxy UDP, I think. But I'm not sure if the TLS handler in caddy-l4 supports TLS over UDP.

@MonkeyBrothers
Copy link
Author

Although what might work is https://github.com/mholt/caddy-l4 which could terminate TLS and then proxy UDP, I think. But I'm not sure if the TLS handler in caddy-l4 supports TLS over UDP.

Thank you very much. I'll try

@marten-seemann
Copy link
Contributor

Although what might work is https://github.com/mholt/caddy-l4 which could terminate TLS and then proxy UDP, I think. But I'm not sure if the TLS handler in caddy-l4 supports TLS over UDP.

This would probably be the best solution: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9298

@marten-seemann so I guess this isn't possible until #5086 is done?

quic-go should have everything you need to resolve that issue, doesn’t it?

@francislavoie
Copy link
Member

quic-go should have everything you need to resolve that issue, doesn’t it?

I think it does, but it's just not a priority of mine to work on that feature. I don't particularly need H3 for anything myself.

@JeDaYoshi
Copy link

JeDaYoshi commented Jul 3, 2024

#5086 was closed with experimental HTTP/3 support implemented for reverse proxies, any chance this issue can be reopened to keep in mind? Would love to see WebTransport support on Caddy.

@francislavoie
Copy link
Member

We don't have any plans to work on it. If someone wants to contribute the feature, then by all means. I don't think we need an issue open for that.

@marten-seemann
Copy link
Contributor

Note that development of webtransport-go is currently on hold due to a lack of funding (quic-go/webtransport-go#156), and WebTransport support is going to break as soon as browsers update to a new IETF draft version.

Please feel free to reach out to me if your company / project relies on WebTransport.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deferred ⏰ We'll come back to this later needs info 📭 Requires more information upstream ⬆️ Relates to some dependency of this project
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants