Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

checkbox remote partially ignores configuration #446

Closed
Hook25 opened this issue May 5, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

checkbox remote partially ignores configuration #446

Hook25 opened this issue May 5, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@Hook25
Copy link
Collaborator

Hook25 commented May 5, 2023

Bug Description

In 439 it seems that some of the parameters in configuration files are not propagated/ignored on the remote.

This configuration file has no effect on remote, who still presents the test selection screen

[test selection]
forced = yes

To Reproduce

  1. Create a configuration file as described and put it in /etc/xdg or ~/.config/
  2. Launch remote/service
  3. Select a test plan on remote

Environment

N/A

Relevant log output

N/A

Additional context

No response

@Hook25 Hook25 added the bug Something isn't working label May 5, 2023
@pieqq
Copy link
Collaborator

pieqq commented May 10, 2023

Once this gets fixed, Metabox scenarios should be updated to test this. At the very basic, we should make sure than if we put any UI-related config in a config file on the device under test (e.g. a forced test selection in /etc/xdg/checkbox.conf) and launch it using Checkbox remote without providing any launcher, the job selection screen is skipped.

@Hook25
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hook25 commented May 10, 2023

I have created a branch that adds the metabox scenario and a FIXME to where I suppose the configuration loading should be done

@kissiel
Copy link
Contributor

kissiel commented Jun 14, 2023

Where

  1. Create a configuration file as described and put it in /etc/xdg or ~/.config/

On which host is the file located?

@Hook25
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hook25 commented Oct 9, 2023

Closing as this is now fixed

@Hook25 Hook25 closed this as completed Oct 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants