Documentation is hosted in github and from there rendered to PDF and the online view at Ubuntu Server docs. This kind of structure gave us better interaction rates and contributions than on Discourse, but to make them worthwhile we need to ensure we pick up and act on what we get there
For the daily triage rotation you only have to look at those issues or pull requests created or updated in the time your duty covers.
Check what the interaction is about and help them to progress and land or resolve.
Right now we have a few tags defined that help us to quickly see in what state an issue/PR was last time as well as later on allowing volunteers to better find how they could help us.
tech-review
used by volunteer triagers, flagging that to go forward this needs a technical or even subject matter expert reviewer.ODA
: used by triagers to declare a case as a good candidate to be resolved by volunteers of the Open Documentation Academy.server:need-info
: to represent that this isn't actionable without further into being provided. This matches an incomplete state in Bug triage.- Classifiations like
code:*
,content:*
,dia:*
can be helpful to allow volunteers to more easily pick cases they can help with, adding them is optional- The use of those only makes sense once a case is actionable and ok for a volunteer to contibute