Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added option to past list of directories to list verb #572

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2019

Conversation

jarvisschultz
Copy link
Contributor

Potential simple fix to address #571

@mikepurvis
Copy link
Member

Looks reasonable. I'm assuming this going in means we also need to update the documentation referenced in the original ticket?

@jarvisschultz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, documentation needs to be updated. Regardless of if this PR is accepted, there are a few instances where the documentation utilizes the list -u functionality that no longer works. If this is accepted, docs should reflect new feature, otherwise, remove references.

Would it be helpful if I updated the docs on this PR?

@mikepurvis
Copy link
Member

I'm fine to merge it now, and you can update the docs in a followup, particularly since the docs are already broken anyway— this change is not making anything worse.

@mikepurvis mikepurvis merged commit 44a7707 into catkin:master Dec 4, 2019
jarvisschultz added a commit to jarvisschultz/catkin_tools that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2020
 - The `-d|--directory` feature was introduced in catkin#572
 - Also ran `dump_cli` to update help literally included on verb documentation
   pages. This updated more than just `docs/verbs/cli/catkin_list.txt`, but they
   were in need of an update
mikepurvis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2020
)

- The `-d|--directory` feature was introduced in #572
 - Also ran `dump_cli` to update help literally included on verb documentation
   pages. This updated more than just `docs/verbs/cli/catkin_list.txt`, but they
   were in need of an update
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants