Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add ability to generate block fraud proofs #195

Closed
Tracked by #514
Manav-Aggarwal opened this issue Jun 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed
Tracked by #514

Add ability to generate block fraud proofs #195

Manav-Aggarwal opened this issue Jun 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
@Manav-Aggarwal
Labels
block-fraud-proofs Block Fraud Proofs (Generation and verification) C: Cevmos Changes related to the cevmos branches

Comments

@Manav-Aggarwal
Copy link
Member

When an optimint full node detects an invalid block (block containing invalid state transitions), it should send a message over ABCI to the corresponding cosmos-app requesting it to generate a block fraud proof which consists of:

  • state root before invalid block was executed
  • state root after block was executed correctly
  • state before block containing invalid state transitions were exectued (in form of the whole cosmos-sdk IAVL tree)
@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal added C: Cevmos Changes related to the cevmos branches block-fraud-proofs Block Fraud Proofs (Generation and verification) labels Jun 14, 2022
@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal self-assigned this Jun 22, 2022
@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal mentioned this issue Jun 22, 2022
Merged
@Manav-Aggarwal
Copy link
Member Author

Closed by: rollkit#1

@tzdybal tzdybal mentioned this issue Nov 17, 2022
Closed
38 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal

Labels
block-fraud-proofs Block Fraud Proofs (Generation and verification) C: Cevmos Changes related to the cevmos branches
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Manav-Aggarwal