We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Attaching example SAST XML and CxFlow Sarif output. Using the Microsoft Sarif Validator on this file produces 121 validation errors.
Produce Sarif with 0 validation errors
Multiple validation errors that indicate many Sarif consumers aren't going to properly interpret the Sarif file.
I executed CxFlow 1.6.45 (1.6.46 is broken and --parse does not work) against the SAST XML report using this script:
--parse
java -Xms512m -Xmx2048m -jar cx-flow-1.6.45-java11.jar --parse \ --app=Checkmarx \ --cx-flow.bug-tracker-impl=Sarif \ --cx-flow.bug-tracker=Sarif \ --cx-flow.filter-severity=High,Medium,Low,Information \ --sarif.file-path=./offline-cx.sarif \ --checkmarx.offline=true \ --logging.level.com=OFF \ --logging.level.org=OFF \ --logging.level.javax=OFF \ --f=$1
CxFlow 1.6.45 Java 17
SimplyVulnerable-[master].xml.txt offline-cx.sarif.json
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fixed in 1.7.01
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Description
Attaching example SAST XML and CxFlow Sarif output. Using the Microsoft Sarif Validator on this file produces 121 validation errors.
Expected Behavior
Produce Sarif with 0 validation errors
Actual Behavior
Multiple validation errors that indicate many Sarif consumers aren't going to properly interpret the Sarif file.
Reproduction
I executed CxFlow 1.6.45 (1.6.46 is broken and
--parse
does not work) against the SAST XML report using this script:Environment Details
CxFlow 1.6.45
Java 17
SimplyVulnerable-[master].xml.txt
offline-cx.sarif.json
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: