-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 528
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consolidated Discussion on Policy Formal verification #242
Consolidated Discussion on Policy Formal verification #242
Conversation
borrowed with reference
fixing syntax
i guess github markdown doesn't support endnotes
mostly commentary
When merged, closes #196 |
Looks good to me. |
It's good to see work from the policy sub-group make its way into the repo! I just had time to skim the doc and added a quick note in-line -- a few nits below on repo style...
Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is great and very detailed content! :)
The document is written as a first person, so probably you may want to add your name as the author in the document as well (unless i missed it somewhere). |
from review feedback, additional materials reviewed
@lumjjb @ultrasaurus I have addressed your suggestions. apologies for also adding additional material in the same commit, but hopefully this updated content is acceptable and can be merged in. @hannibalhuang @ericavonb will review on today's policy call (I think we have one scheduled, yes?) |
@rficcaglia This is a really good write up and a great starting point. |
and additional cleanup, tweaks, snark removal
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we have had detailed discussion during the wg-policy meeting and the current document looks good to go
Consolidated Discussion on Policy Formal verification
This is a write up of a discussion that started a couple months ago regarding formal verification. This narrows the scope to policy verification, akin to SecGuru, AWS Zelkova and Tiros.
Discussed on the Policy WG call 7/24/19.