Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More control over solver behavior requested. #8

Open
svigerske opened this issue Mar 2, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

More control over solver behavior requested. #8

svigerske opened this issue Mar 2, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Osi Base Class

Comments

@svigerske
Copy link
Member

Issue created by migration from Trac.

Original creator: dan.gordon

Original creation time: 2006-08-25 04:18:10

Assignee: @mjsaltzman

Version:

When using OsiXpr, I need to be able to use the Newton barrier solver. It's just that much more efficient with my application.

The present behaviour is to use automatic solver selection for initialSolve() and to use dual simplex for resolve().

There is no means of changing this behaviour in OsiSolverInterface or OsiXprSolverInterface. There is no access to the XPRSprob member _prob. Even if there were, this would not help when calling resolve(). Likewise, there are no parameter(s) in OsiSolverInterface to give this kind of control over the solver behaviour.

At present, I'm forced to produce my own version of OsiXprSolverInterface. It would be neater to avoid this, say, by having a parameter in OsiSolverInterface that allows the selection of a preferred method whenever there is a choice available (say interior point/primal simplex/dual simplex).

Thanks, Dan

@svigerske svigerske added enhancement New feature or request minor OsiXpr labels Mar 2, 2019
@svigerske
Copy link
Member Author

Comment by @mjsaltzman created at 2006-10-29 19:37:33

Do you have patches already that we might consider?

@svigerske
Copy link
Member Author

Support to choose interior point algorithms is something that would need to be added to the Osi base class first.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Osi Base Class
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant