Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Publish Dockerfiles for fpco/stack-build etc, or deprecate them #2137

Closed
robinp opened this issue May 14, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Publish Dockerfiles for fpco/stack-build etc, or deprecate them #2137

robinp opened this issue May 14, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@robinp
Copy link

robinp commented May 14, 2016

It is somewhat frustrating that the official stack docker documentation is referring to images that don't have the Dockerfiles avaliable, so customization is not possible.

I would propose either publishing them, or updating the doc to point to public ones, or at least guidelines on how to build custom ones (what to include, any special arrangement needed, etc).

I also see a stack-base dockerfile in this repo - is that in any way related?

Thank you!

@aaronc
Copy link

aaronc commented May 26, 2016

stack-build and stack-run are great, but I just ran into issues with stack-run:lts-6 (still works on stack-run:lts-5 even though it's built against lts-6). There's really no way the community can help debugging such issues when the Dockerfile's are closed source...

@borsboom
Copy link
Contributor

I'm closing as a duplicate of #624.

We do want to open the scripts, but unfortunately right now it's bunch of Propellor code with conditionals throughout to enable/disable various proprietary client-specific features, so it's not a trivial thing to do. The scripts have to be refactored so we can make the proprietary parts external.

@aaronc: chances are the difference you're seeing is that the lts-6 images are based on Ubuntu 16.04 xenial (lts-5 images are based on 14.04 trusty).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants