Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow UDAF to be a processor/transformer #2438

Open
orchesio opened this issue Feb 13, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Allow UDAF to be a processor/transformer #2438

orchesio opened this issue Feb 13, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@orchesio
Copy link

Current UDAF is very limited to certain operations, and input types. It will be very useful to allow UDAF be a processor/transformer.

To be able to achieve that, several things need to happen

  1. Add annotations to UDAF to allow state store creation. @UDFFactory @StateStore
  2. UDAF function interface changes as mentioned in here
  3. Allow physical planner to attach transformer/process to DSL.
  4. Associate schema/serde with schema registry

There must be other things needed here but want to get your input on how to or whether it's feasible to support this.

@vkabanorv
Copy link

I think the implementation of this feature would be really great for KSQL. Is there anything I can do to facilitate this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants