Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove GzipHandler Fork #2436

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2017
Merged

Remove GzipHandler Fork #2436

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2017

Conversation

ldez
Copy link
Contributor

@ldez ldez commented Nov 20, 2017

What does this PR do?

Remove GzipHandler Fork

Motivation

Remove a fork.

Additional Notes

Related to #2380 and nytimes/gziphandler#60

@ldez ldez added bot/light-review decreases the number of required LGTM from 3 to 1. status/2-needs-review labels Nov 20, 2017
@traefiker traefiker added this to the 1.4 milestone Nov 20, 2017
@ldez ldez added area/middleware kind/enhancement a new or improved feature. labels Nov 20, 2017
mmatur
mmatur approved these changes Nov 20, 2017
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@mmatur mmatur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👏

@traefiker traefiker merged commit c9129b8 into traefik:v1.4 Nov 20, 2017
@traefiker traefiker removed bot/light-review decreases the number of required LGTM from 3 to 1. status/3-needs-merge labels Nov 20, 2017
@ldez ldez deleted the feature/gzip-handler branch November 20, 2017 17:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mmatur mmatur mmatur approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/middleware kind/enhancement a new or improved feature. size/S
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.4
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@ldez @mmatur @traefiker