Clarify swarm loadbalancer documentation #4194
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ldez
suggested changes
Nov 13, 2018
jlevesy
force-pushed
the
clarify-swarm-loadbalancer-documentation
branch
from
fb8f8dd
to
83906e1
Compare
mmatur
added
status/2-needs-review
bot/no-merge
and removed
status/0-needs-triage
labels
jlevesy
force-pushed
the
clarify-swarm-loadbalancer-documentation
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b1d4171
to
265e6eb
Compare
|
Thank you for adding this note @jlevesy! It finally explains why I could not configure sticky sessions for one of my projects that uses docker swarm :-D |
jlevesy
force-pushed
the
clarify-swarm-loadbalancer-documentation
branch
from
265e6eb
to
e1731d9
Compare
mmatur
added
status/3-needs-merge
area/documentation
and removed
status/2-needs-review
labels
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Add a note which clarifies Traefik's behaviour when the
traefik.backend.loadbalancer.swarm=truelabel is set on a backend.Motivation
Traefik's behaviour in that case caused some misunderstanding (see #4179 and #2138).
Here's a proposal to improve the documentation.
WDYT folks ?