GraphQL and Discovery API disagree on nodes' names

[andrewazores]

The Discovery API resports nodes' names as their implemented Kind, ex. Realm or Pod. The GraphQL API just serializes the enum member's name directly, ie REALM and POD. In all of our current use cases this only amounts to a casing difference, but it would still be best if these were consistent between the two API endpoints.

[andrewazores]

Various sources and documentation states that GraphQL doesn't really support mapping enum types to other values, ex:

graphql-java-kickstart/graphql-java-tools#426

It is possible to do it by wrapping the type in a GraphQL scalar and other such tricks, but this means that the GraphQL side of the implementation will have to duplicate all of the NodeTypes already declared by our internal Platforms API, which is what is exposed by the Discovery HTTP API.