Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed so that we don't execute features with zero scenarios #315

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 23, 2020

Conversation

lonnblad
Copy link
Member

Solution for #196

@lonnblad lonnblad force-pushed the remove-features-with-no-scenarios branch from f325c89 to 70d7853 Compare June 21, 2020 09:12
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 21, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #315 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #315      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.40%   85.39%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          23       23              
  Lines        2686     2684       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         2294     2292       -2     
  Misses        265      265              
  Partials      127      127              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
run.go 72.86% <ø> (-0.28%) ⬇️
parser.go 80.43% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1033ce0...7df9dad. Read the comment docs.

@lonnblad lonnblad force-pushed the remove-features-with-no-scenarios branch from 70d7853 to c686151 Compare June 23, 2020 17:51
@lonnblad lonnblad force-pushed the remove-features-with-no-scenarios branch from c686151 to 7df9dad Compare June 23, 2020 17:53
@lonnblad lonnblad merged commit b7dd087 into master Jun 23, 2020
@mattwynne mattwynne deleted the remove-features-with-no-scenarios branch April 30, 2022 21:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant