Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom model for automatic annotation #2926

Closed
valavanisleonidas opened this issue Mar 9, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #3124
Closed

Custom model for automatic annotation #2926

valavanisleonidas opened this issue Mar 9, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #3124
Assignees
Labels
documentation Documentation should be updated duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@valavanisleonidas
Copy link

Hello, I have seen many issues asking this but I am not sure about the answer.

I have some data and I want to train my own model to annotate. Is it possible to do that? If so, are there instructions somewhere on how to do that?

Also is there a specific framework required for training i.e. pytorch, tensorflow?

Thanks

@nmanovic nmanovic self-assigned this Mar 9, 2021
@nmanovic nmanovic added duplicate This issue or pull request already exists enhancement New feature or request labels Mar 9, 2021
@nmanovic nmanovic added documentation Documentation should be updated and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Mar 9, 2021
@nmanovic nmanovic added this to the Backlog milestone Mar 9, 2021
@nmanovic
Copy link
Contributor

@valavanisleonidas , please read the tutorial: #3124. The PR should be merged soon. In any case the tutorial has necessary information already now.

https://github.com/openvinotoolkit/cvat/blob/49e4875dad6d2b61d306078f25d05e69dab97f50/site/content/en/docs/manual/advanced/serverless-tutorial.md

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Documentation should be updated duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants