Push new docker image to support SSO

[yggdrasil-tynor]

Was released 2 days ago: https://github.com/bitwarden/web/releases/tag/v2.16.0

[BlackDex]

SSO Will not work without server-side changes.
We probably have to implement a lot of code to support this.
Only updating the web-vault will not do the trick.

[PrivatePuffin]

SSO Will not work without server-side changes.
We probably have to implement a lot of code to support this.
Only updating the web-vault will not do the trick.

I've looked into it, the server-side changes are actually quite minimal. Their implementation is basically comparable to a reverse proxy in front of bitwarden (but integrated), it does not replace the normal login and master-password requirements.

Some more info:
https://github.com/bitwarden/server/commits/fd6b10df564778ea73c00e8dcecc00aa74c5eb7d/src/Core/Enums/SsoType.cs
https://bitwarden.com/help/article/getting-started-with-sso/

[xdubx]

It would play into my hands if that were to be implemented. But I can only support the statement of Ornias1993.

[BlackDex]

Everyone can create a PR to implement this 😉.
Would be nice to have this, including all lot of other stuff.
When someone has time to implement this it will probably be pushed and merged.

[littlebigmedia]

This would be huge if added correctly!

[BlackDex]

To keep the issue tracker more focused, I'm closing this issue in favor of the meta issue at #246

[PrivatePuffin]

@BlackDex Besides the fact that it has nothing to do with a docker image needing to be pushed.

[pinpox]

I'd like to implement this, but would need a bit of guidance since I've not worked on valtwarden yet. @Ornias1993 What/where would be a good starting point for the changes you mentioned? Would be great to get any pointers!

[jiwanovski87]

@pinpox Have you already started with the implementation?

[pinpox]

@jiwanovski87 There has been some work here: #1955

[BloodyIron]

Can we get SAML?