Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing data in 'image information' #6686

Closed
davidvj opened this issue Oct 30, 2020 · 7 comments · Fixed by #6711
Closed

Missing data in 'image information' #6686

davidvj opened this issue Oct 30, 2020 · 7 comments · Fixed by #6711

Comments

@davidvj
Copy link

davidvj commented Oct 30, 2020

When using a DNG format file that was produced by a Huawei camera-phone I note that both the aperture and the speed information is not available in the 'image information'. I questioned this problem over the dt-forum and have confirmation from an other that this appears to be the same problem on other (Android) cameras.-->
When the DNG file is exported to a JPG file all of the image information including the aperture and speed are correctly written to the EXIF file in the JPG.
I am running the daily git ... Manjaro .. Arch ... XFCE

@kmilos
Copy link
Contributor

kmilos commented Oct 31, 2020

I guess this is because dt checks for those (and possibly some other Exif tags) only in the Exif.Photo IFD, while DNGs only contain Exif.Image?

@kmilos
Copy link
Contributor

kmilos commented Nov 1, 2020

Yep, almost everything is pulled only from Exif.Photo here.

Focal length info is curious though, as it uses Exiv2's own accessor, no idea though if that one checks all possible IFDs...

@kmilos
Copy link
Contributor

kmilos commented Nov 1, 2020

Turns out the Exiv2 accessors do the right thing.

@kmilos
Copy link
Contributor

kmilos commented Nov 13, 2020

One has to remove the DNG files from the collection and re-import them unfortunately, I don't know any other way of triggering metadata re-read...

@davidvj
Copy link
Author

davidvj commented Nov 13, 2020 via email

@kmilos
Copy link
Contributor

kmilos commented Nov 13, 2020

darktable 3.3.0+1575~g1396c9b7f

But does it have this patch applied, or you just built clean master?

@kmilos
Copy link
Contributor

kmilos commented Dec 3, 2020

Here's a demo of master vs PR:

image image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants