Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation about conflict with python mode. #250

Closed
itissid opened this issue Feb 9, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

Documentation about conflict with python mode. #250

itissid opened this issue Feb 9, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@itissid
Copy link

itissid commented Feb 9, 2014

Hi,
In your documentation its stated that: python-mode seems to interfere with jedi so we should disable it. I dont want to start a discussion about pros and cons. But rather we made it explicit that what is it exactly what it is that should be disabled(Outright disabling is rather extreme IMHO)?
I think this documentation will make the transition/cooperation between python-mode users and jedi users easier. There are also features like auto refactoring that aren't really available in jedi that are as good as rope.

@davidhalter
Copy link
Owner

You're right. But I don't really understand the problem. I just know that some people complained.

@davidhalter
Copy link
Owner

Closing this, because it doesn't really help with the current status quo. If somebody is able to document this well, I'm happy to take any pull requests. But it's not really a jedi-vim issue, since jedi-vim is at the moment a small and lightweight plugin, compared to python-mode. I think the problem is probably on the python-mode side, because they do a thousand different things (like debugging, etc).

i.e. you just have to decide at the moment which plugin to use. Jedi will introduce refactoring at some point, but we still need to improve the parser at the moment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants