Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about AMS block #5

Open
WenBin6 opened this issue May 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Question about AMS block #5

WenBin6 opened this issue May 5, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@WenBin6
Copy link

WenBin6 commented May 5, 2024

Hello, I apologize for the inconvenience. Regarding your observation about the parameters passed to the AMS block, specifically the patch_size being a single element array, there won't be any errors even if there is only one patch size specified. The AMS block relies on different patch sizes to generate multiple experts. However, if only one patch size is provided, the AMS block will still function properly using the default value of experts_nums, which is 4. The experts will be generated based on the given patch size, enabling the AMS block to process and analyze the input data effectively. Therefore, you can use the AMS block with confidence, even if you have only one patch size as an input parameter, without encountering any errors.

@Gzlzero
Copy link

Gzlzero commented May 28, 2024

sorry to ask this question. Is the Multi-Scale Router in the AMS block? Its' hard to understand this model. Do you have any toturial?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants