Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VRF implementation #144

Open
nikkolasg opened this issue Apr 27, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

VRF implementation #144

nikkolasg opened this issue Apr 27, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@nikkolasg
Copy link
Collaborator

Now that we have DLEQ merged upstream, we can implement in a more or less straightforward way a VRF. The groundwork is already done in https://github.com/dedis/paper_17_sosp_omniledger/blob/master/gossip/vrf.go
It is mostly a question of API and arranging stuff around...
Also we must verify that this implementation is correct regarding the bug raised in the CONIKS repo and KT repo.

@nikkolasg nikkolasg self-assigned this Apr 27, 2017
@goldbe
Copy link

goldbe commented Jul 5, 2017

Have you seen our IETF Internet draft on VRFs? (The bug in CONIKS and KT you mention above was reported by us...)

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-goldbe-vrf/

@nikkolasg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thank you for pointing it out to us, we'll definitely have a look when we'll tackle this issue then. It's definitely better if we can try to stick to the (future) standards ;)

@bford
Copy link
Contributor

bford commented Jul 6, 2017

Hi Sharon, yes I've definitely seen your I-D on VRFs! Nice work, and I've been hoping to find time to do a more detailed read and comment pass; will try to before (or worst-case during) the Prague IETF. Looking forward to meeting and catching up there hopefully!

@goldbe
Copy link

goldbe commented Jul 10, 2017

Yes, see you in Prague! Would love to work with you guys,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants