[BUG]: prefix with 99- the PowerMax MachineConfig sample for multipathing

[coulof]

Bug Description

There is a convention to index the MachineConfig names to better control the order of processing.

For some reason, one of the sample is not properly prefixed : https://dell.github.io/csm-docs/docs/deployment/csmoperator/drivers/powermax/#linux-multipathing-requirements

Logs

NA

Screenshots

No response

Additional Environment Information

No response

Steps to Reproduce

Read the doc

Expected Behavior

Use convention

CSM Driver(s)

PowerMax

Installation Type

Operator

Container Storage Modules Enabled

No response

Container Orchestrator

OCP 4.17

Operating System

CoreOS

[csmbot]

@coulof: Thank you for submitting this issue!

The issue is currently awaiting triage. Please make sure you have given us as much context as possible.

If the maintainers determine this is a relevant issue, they will remove the needs-triage label and respond appropriately.

---

We want your feedback! If you have any questions or suggestions regarding our contributing process/workflow, please reach out to us at container.storage.modules@dell.com.