-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 201
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
UX | AuthMenu Claims and Disability Rating | Research Plan #72640
Comments
@mtcA6 sharing about a loose timeline to help with convos/planning while I'm out. This assumes that:
Jan 9-12: Work on the plan and conversation guide |
I think they're on track for 1/17, they do not intend to add the two additional items to the auth menu so we'll need to do that. See the comments on #16573 My only question is, will you need Adam's help to add those to the codepen? |
@mtcA6 I won't need Adam's help to add those to the CodePen, but I might need his help to build out some other pages. I will know more once I start working through the research plan (so in about 24 hrs). |
@Samara-Strauss and @mtcA6 I've made a lot of progress on the research docs for this work and am ready for your input. Here's some more context about what I'm thinking. I have some questions in bold that I'd love your feedback on. Research plan
The research plan is ready for your review. Conversation guideThis is a bit harder to make progress on without the full prototype, but I've seen enough bits and pieces to make solid progress here. Here's a draft of the guide you can review. It feels light, but I expect to add more guidance prompts once I have that. The core questions are there though. A few notes:
I'm excited to hear your feedback! |
Hey Liz -- acknowledging receipt, and that I will review these tomorrow. |
Hi @Samara-Strauss, thanks for your feedback on our call today and all the great points you made! I updated both documents in the following ways:
Both docs are available for review in this folder. Let me know if this feels better to you. Thanks again for your comments! |
@andaleliz this is MUCH better. Thank you! Looks good to go for a review from Amanda or Cindy. |
Thanks @Samara-Strauss! I asked them in Slack to drop any feedback here in the next day or so. I'm also checking with Adam to try to get an ETA for when we'll have the start of a prototype, so we can drop a link in the plan and kick off recruitment. We have an awesome start with what the Sitewide team has provided us. |
@andaleliz A few thoughts that came up while I was reviewing your research plan.
|
FYI In my experience, Shane doesn't approve research for recruiting without a working prototype. @andaleliz @aklausmeier |
@aklausmeier thank you for this feedback, and linking to that CAIA a11y review ticket. This is all really helpful. I also appreciate your willingness to be available to answer any future questions we have too! Responses to your questions/suggestions:
Yes, we are planning on kicking off recruiting before the prototype is totally complete. We expect to have it far enough along for Shane to understand what we're doing and be able to start recruiting. I'm not sure Shane will go for it but I think it's at least worth a conversation with him (cc @cindymerrill).
Great idea, and thanks for pointing out these needed additions. I didn't realize that we were conducting the Phase 3 research you had planned; I was under the impression that this was a preliminary supplement to what your team would do in phase 3. I've updated our plan accordingly.
I love this question, and have added it to the post-task interview portion of the convo guide.
Yes, I'm interested to see how it goes. I removed the sign out button from the desktop design, and added Sign Out to the bottom of the list of links. I also removed the Closing out this ticket since we have no further revisions to our plan. |
I'm sorry -- that is on me for not having communicated this adequately. |
No worries @Samara-Strauss! There was a bit of telephone going on since we were both out at different times, and the holidays. It feels like we still got a place that will cover the needs for Phase 3, even without that specified from the get go 😄 |
Background
We need to create a research plan for the Auth Menu Expansion we're testing in the new header/footer
Tasks
Acceptance Criteria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: