Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

bug in ufw.j2 template #151

Closed
Zurlys opened this issue Oct 26, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

bug in ufw.j2 template #151

Zurlys opened this issue Oct 26, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
@rndmh3ro
Labels
bug

Comments

@Zurlys
Copy link

Zurlys commented Oct 26, 2017

Bug with Ubuntu 16.04+
With single quotes in /etc/default/ufw you encouter error when using ufw command.
F.ex.
srv1 # ufw status
ERROR: Missing policy for 'input'

Please change default POLICY values to be included into double quotes, not the single ones.
F.ex. change
DEFAULT_INPUT_POLICY='{{ ufw_default_input_policy }}'
to
DEFAULT_INPUT_POLICY="{{ ufw_default_input_policy }}"
@rndmh3ro rndmh3ro added the bug label Oct 27, 2017
@rndmh3ro rndmh3ro self-assigned this Oct 27, 2017
artem-sidorenko added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 28, 2017
@artem-sidorenko
Merge pull request #152 from dev-sec/fix_ufw_151
bf6cb73 
replace single ticks with double ticks. fix #151
rndmh3ro pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 23, 2017
replace single ticks with double ticks. fix #151
d40f644
divialth pushed a commit to divialth/ansible-collection-hardening that referenced this issue Aug 3, 2022
replace single ticks with double ticks. fix dev-sec#151
0f5d4c7
divialth pushed a commit to divialth/ansible-collection-hardening that referenced this issue Aug 3, 2022
@artem-sidorenko
Merge pull request dev-sec#152 from dev-sec/fix_ufw_151
4980542 
replace single ticks with double ticks. fix dev-sec#151
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rndmh3ro rndmh3ro

Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@alexpop @rndmh3ro @Zurlys