You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We need to agree on a convention to specify the step(s) of the development lifecycle a command belongs to. For example a given command will be used during the build step and another one is used for the run step. Tools like odo and che will then leverage this information to infer the sequence of the commands that need to be run.
A possible convention we can agree on is to specify the lifecycleStep as command annotation:
Additionally, about the syntax proposed here: do we assume annotations would be some sort of free map (without a sub-schema) ?
Why not add this as a real field in the command schema itself ?
We need to agree on a convention to specify the step(s) of the development lifecycle a command belongs to. For example a given command will be used during the
build
step and another one is used for therun
step. Tools likeodo
andche
will then leverage this information to infer the sequence of the commands that need to be run.A possible convention we can agree on is to specify the
lifecycleStep
as command annotation:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: