Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Who uses Backbone-Associations? #55

Open
dhruvaray opened this issue Jul 21, 2013 · 24 comments
Open

Who uses Backbone-Associations? #55

dhruvaray opened this issue Jul 21, 2013 · 24 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@dhruvaray
Copy link
Owner

A compilation of projects which use Backbone-Associations. Please add your own project or product to this list. It would be wonderful and motivating to hear your story!

@ghost ghost assigned dhruvaray Jul 21, 2013
@dhruvaray
Copy link
Owner Author

Source : Google Search

Kinvey

  • Kinvey & Google Partnership

http://techcrunch.com/2013/06/05/google-app-engine-adds-kinvey-to-power-mobile-backend/
"Google is broadening its reach into the mobile app development world today through a partnership with Kinvey, which will provide an enterprise backend-as-a-service (BaaS) layer on top of Google App Engine. With Kinvey, Google App Engine will support iOS, Android"

  • On their Backbone stack

http://devcenter.kinvey.com/backbone/guides/datastore#RelationalData
"If you are planning on using this functionality, we highly recommend including the Backbone-associations plugin. Internally, the library checks for the presence of this plugin and adds additional functionality accordingly. The remainder of this guide will assume you are using this plugin."

@dhruvaray
Copy link
Owner Author

Source : Issue #51

The RESThub stack (http://resthub.org/) is currently porting from Backbone-Relational to Backbone-Associations!

@sdeleuze
Copy link

RESThub 2.1.2 has been released and now includes by default Backbone Associations 0.5.1.

@pplante
Copy link

pplante commented Aug 1, 2013

At @rentlytics we're porting from backbone-relational in a new version of our software. For the most part its been going rather well with @monokrome only submitting 2 issues so far. He has been heading up the new version, so maybe he can share some of his thoughts with you. But this library is much cleaner to work with than backbone-relational, mostly because it is simpler and does less things.

@dhruvaray
Copy link
Owner Author

@pplante : Thanks for sharing this! I am glad and excited to hear that @rentlytics is moving over to BB-Associations! As usual, I would like to hear about your porting experiences - so that we can incorporate them into our documentation.

does less things

  1. No implicit store or cache or model identity management : In our experience, the app tends to bloat (memory wise) due to this. If we ever added this feature, it would be injected externally (and optionally) with another store plugin.
  2. No implicit fetch/save : Difficult to generalize in an useful way for network (read web) applications. Clearly, we don't want entire object graphs being serialized across the network. Having said this, folks can easily customize it for their needs. Kinvey seems to have done it for their Backend-As-A-Service platform.
  3. No explicit reverse relations : It can cause ambiguities. I have opened How important is it to have an explicit reverse relation support? #51 to discuss why folks need this?
  4. No sub-types.

BB-Associations brings different capabilities to the table - after we cross the model-association definition phase

  1. We only share the BB-Relational API definition - when it comes to defining associations(relations). Beneath the covers, it is a significantly simpler implementation - which is easier to understand, extend and maintain.
  2. BB-Associations provides a superior eventing experience (in an object hierarchy scenario) and notion of paths. You can now listen to any events happening in your object hierarchy stored within your web-app (or SPA). And can respond to them. (Like update your views). You can find comprehensive documentation about events here. I would encourage your team to look at this feature to simplify your code-base.
  3. It is fast (relative to BB-Relational), tiny (2.4KB gzipped and minified) and consumes no app memory - other than what it takes to define (and instantiate) your models.
  4. It supports self-reference and cycle scenarios.

@filR
Copy link

filR commented Oct 21, 2013

http://www.tapestry.net/
We use backbone associations for our phonegap iOS, android and soon desktop app. Why do we use it? We'd be crazy not to.

@dhruvaray
Copy link
Owner Author

@filR : Thank you! You made our day!

@kosmotaur
Copy link

Hi!

We are using Backbone-associations at Pearson's Data Analytics and Visualization team. The UI portion of the current project is for defining certain query parameters to get insight on English courses and how students do in them. There's lots of intertwined metadata to be stored on our models, and your library made it palatable, maintainable and pleasant to work with.

Thanks!

@dhruvaray
Copy link
Owner Author

@kosmotaur : Wow! It is an honor to be associated with all your efforts! Thank you so much for sharing this...

@astjohn
Copy link

astjohn commented Oct 21, 2013

At Sitata, we're currently migrating from Backbone Relational. The decision was made 100% based on the store concept, which didn't jive well with our existing patterns. Backbone associations is much simpler and hopefully won't introduce easy opportunities for our devs to create memory leaks.

@dhruvaray
Copy link
Owner Author

@astjohn : Wonderful! I think you should not have any issues, but should you find something, please do file on the issue tracking system.

@asheriff
Copy link

At Vaddio after evaluating several relational plugins we chose backbone-associations to build real-time web interfaces for audio and video devices running embedded linux. Thanks for this plugin.

@dhruvaray
Copy link
Owner Author

Thanks @asheriff for sharing this! We are honored...

@logankoester
Copy link

At DanceSafe we are using Backbone-Associations in our Android mobile app to provide drug safety & harm reduction information to the rave & nightclub community.

@jdkanani
Copy link
Contributor

jdkanani commented Feb 5, 2014

Wow! Thank you @logankoester

@svperfecta
Copy link

If @logankoester uses it, it's good enough for me. We use it here for client work @madgloryint

@logankoester
Copy link

🌵 🍍 😋

@dhruvaray
Copy link
Owner Author

Great to hear that @genexp!

@jdkanani
Copy link
Contributor

@genexp 👍

@atomictag
Copy link

oneoverzero uses backbone.associations on many web projects.
Two mobile apps recently added to the portfolio: Credit Suisse VIVA and Cornèrcard Mobile (available for both iOS and Android)

@jnwng
Copy link

jnwng commented Nov 4, 2014

at Coursera, we're using backbone-associations pretty extensively for our new on-demand platform, an example of which you can find here

@jdkanani
Copy link
Contributor

jdkanani commented Nov 5, 2014

@atomictag and @jnwng Wow! That's awesome 👍

@pascalpp
Copy link

At about.me we're in the midst of rewriting our core product using Marionette and Backbone Associations. Really liking it and can't wait to launch it. We've hit a snag though, regarding previous model attributes getting obliterated by fetching data on the parent model. I've posted a reduction of the issue at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27086259/merge-attributes-when-using-model-set-with-backbone-associations. If anyone here can shed some light on that question, I'd be really grateful.

Update: got an answer to my question: these singleton related models need to have an id assigned in order for attributes to get merged. Makes sense.

@theoephraim
Copy link

Using it heavily on our booking platform at http://breather.com 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests