There are a number of prediction functions in XGBoost with various parameters. This
document attempts to clarify some of confusions around prediction with a focus on the
Python binding, R package is similar when strict_shape
is specified (see below).
There are a number of different prediction options for the
:py:meth:`xgboost.Booster.predict` method, ranging from pred_contribs
to
pred_leaf
. The output shape depends on types of prediction. Also for multi-class
classification problem, XGBoost builds one tree for each class and the trees for each
class are called a "group" of trees, so output dimension may change due to used model.
After 1.4 release, we added a new parameter called strict_shape
, one can set it to
True
to indicate a more restricted output is desired. Assuming you are using
:py:obj:`xgboost.Booster`, here is a list of possible returns:
When using normal prediction with
strict_shape
set toTrue
:Output is a 2-dim array with first dimension as rows and second as groups. For regression/survival/ranking/binary classification this is equivalent to a column vector with
shape[1] == 1
. But for multi-class withmulti:softprob
the number of columns equals to number of classes. If strict_shape is set to False then XGBoost might output 1 or 2 dim array.When using
output_margin
to avoid transformation andstrict_shape
is set toTrue
:Similar to the previous case, output is a 2-dim array, except for that
multi:softmax
has equivalent output shape ofmulti:softprob
due to dropped transformation. If strict shape is set to False then output can have 1 or 2 dim depending on used model.When using
pred_contribs
withstrict_shape
set toTrue
:Output is a 3-dim array, with
(rows, groups, columns + 1)
as shape. Whetherapprox_contribs
is used does not change the output shape. If the strict shape parameter is not set, it can be a 2 or 3 dimension array depending on whether multi-class model is being used.When using
pred_interactions
withstrict_shape
set toTrue
:Output is a 4-dim array, with
(rows, groups, columns + 1, columns + 1)
as shape. Like the predict contribution case, whetherapprox_contribs
is used does not change the output shape. If strict shape is set to False, it can have 3 or 4 dims depending on the underlying model.When using
pred_leaf
withstrict_shape
set toTrue
:Output is a 4-dim array with
(n_samples, n_iterations, n_classes, n_trees_in_forest)
as shape.n_trees_in_forest
is specified by thenumb_parallel_tree
during training. When strict shape is set to False, output is a 2-dim array with last 3 dims concatenated into 1. Also the last dimension is dropped if it equals to 1. When usingapply
method in scikit learn interface, this is set to False by default.
For R package, when strict_shape
is specified, an array
is returned, with the same
value as Python except R array is column-major while Python numpy array is row-major, so
all the dimensions are reversed. For example, for a Python predict_leaf
output
obtained by having strict_shape=True
has 4 dimensions: (n_samples, n_iterations,
n_classes, n_trees_in_forest)
, while R with strict_shape=TRUE
outputs
(n_trees_in_forest, n_classes, n_iterations, n_samples)
.
Other than these prediction types, there's also a parameter called iteration_range
,
which is similar to model slicing. But instead of actually splitting up the model into
multiple stacks, it simply returns the prediction formed by the trees within range.
Number of trees created in each iteration equals to trees_i = num\_class \times
num\_parallel\_tree. So if you are training a boosted random forest with size of 4, on
the 3-class classification dataset, and want to use the first 2 iterations of trees for
prediction, you need to provide iteration_range=(0, 2)
. Then the first 2
\times 3 \times 4 trees will be used in this prediction.
When a model is trained with early stopping, there is an inconsistent behavior between
native Python interface and sklearn/R interfaces. By default on R and sklearn interfaces,
the best_iteration
is automatically used so prediction comes from the best model. But
with the native Python interface :py:meth:`xgboost.Booster.predict` and
:py:meth:`xgboost.Booster.inplace_predict` uses the full model. Users can use
best_iteration
attribute with iteration_range
parameter to achieve the same
behavior. Also the save_best
parameter from :py:obj:`xgboost.callback.EarlyStopping`
might be useful.
There's a training parameter in XGBoost called base_score
, and a meta data for
DMatrix
called base_margin
(which can be set in fit
method if you are using
scikit-learn interface). They specifies the global bias for boosted model. If the latter
is supplied then former is ignored. base_margin
can be used to train XGBoost model
based on other models. See demos on boosting from predictions.
Using the native interface with DMatrix
, prediction can be staged (or cached). For
example, one can first predict on the first 4 trees then run prediction on 8 trees. After
running the first prediction, result from first 4 trees are cached so when you run the
prediction with 8 trees XGBoost can reuse the result from previous prediction. The cache
expires automatically upon next prediction, train or evaluation if the cached DMatrix
object is expired (like going out of scope and being collected by garbage collector in
your language environment).
Traditionally XGBoost accepts only DMatrix
for prediction, with wrappers like
scikit-learn interface the construction happens internally. We added support for in-place
predict to bypass the construction of DMatrix
, which is slow and memory consuming.
The new predict function has limited features but is often sufficient for simple inference
tasks. It accepts some commonly found data types in Python like :py:obj:`numpy.ndarray`,
:py:obj:`scipy.sparse.csr_matrix` and :py:obj:`cudf.DataFrame` instead of
:py:obj:`xgboost.DMatrix`. You can call :py:meth:`xgboost.Booster.inplace_predict` to use
it. Be aware that the output of in-place prediction depends on input data type, when
input is on GPU data output is :py:obj:`cupy.ndarray`, otherwise a :py:obj:`numpy.ndarray`
is returned.
After 1.4 release, all prediction functions including normal predict
with various
parameters like shap value computation and inplace_predict
are thread safe when
underlying booster is gbtree
or dart
, which means as long as tree model is used,
prediction itself should thread safe. But the safety is only guaranteed with prediction.
If one tries to train a model in one thread and provide prediction at the other using the
same model the behaviour is undefined. This happens easier than one might expect, for
instance we might accidentally call clf.set_params()
inside a predict function:
def predict_fn(clf: xgb.XGBClassifier, X):
X = preprocess(X)
clf.set_params(n_jobs=1) # NOT safe!
return clf.predict_proba(X, iteration_range=(0, 10))
with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=10) as e:
e.submit(predict_fn, ...)
Concrete ML is a third-party open-source library developed by Zama that proposes gradient boosting classes similar to ours, but predicting directly over encrypted data, thanks to Fully Homomorphic Encryption. A simple example would be as follows:
from sklearn.datasets import make_classification
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from concrete.ml.sklearn import XGBClassifier
x, y = make_classification(n_samples=100, class_sep=2, n_features=30, random_state=42)
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(
x, y, test_size=10, random_state=42
)
# Train in the clear and quantize the weights
model = XGBClassifier()
model.fit(X_train, y_train)
# Simulate the predictions in the clear
y_pred_clear = model.predict(X_test)
# Compile in FHE
model.compile(X_train)
# Generate keys
model.fhe_circuit.keygen()
# Run the inference on encrypted inputs!
y_pred_fhe = model.predict(X_test, fhe="execute")
print("In clear :", y_pred_clear)
print("In FHE :", y_pred_fhe)
print(f"Similarity: {int((y_pred_fhe == y_pred_clear).mean()*100)}%")
More information and examples are given in the Concrete ML documentation.