-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 477
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Alpine 3.9 #279
Comments
Closing as a duplicate of #276. 👍 |
Thanks, I totally missed that! 👍 |
Is there a way to have |
@damianobarbati, the answer would basically be the same as #385 (comment); |
Thanks @yosifkit, I see |
It was also dropped as of 14 GA (485e574), so there is only the alpine builds for 15 ea. |
We have a support matrix of the OpenJDK variants that we maintain #272 |
Alpine 3.9 is the new stable series: https://www.alpinelinux.org/posts/Alpine-3.9.0-released.html
I have read #272, and even if Alpine 3.8 provides the same JDK version as Alpine 3.9, wouldn't it make sense to base the Docker images on the newer Alpine?
This is mainly interesting when using the openjdk image as a base image for our own image, where we add additional software via apk.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: