You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In this issue, the proposal is to also accept a fully qualified contract name to avoid possible clashes. This by detecting if the given name already contains :: at least once.
This will allow those two behaviors
// Lookup only to the last segment of the module path as currently done.awaitexecute(props.signer,"actions","spawn",[props.rps]);// Search for the exact path.awaitexecute(props.signer,"emojiman::actions::actions","spawn",[props.rps]);
If the request is accepted, would you be willing to contribute it?
Yes I would be willing to contribute
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feedback
Currently, when
execute
is called on theDojoProvider
, under the hood only the name of the contract is looked up.In this issue, the proposal is to also accept a fully qualified contract name to avoid possible clashes. This by detecting if the given name already contains
::
at least once.This will allow those two behaviors
If the request is accepted, would you be willing to contribute it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: