-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pin a couple of packages in 3.0 and 3.1 branches #18519
Comments
Hmm, can't add this to https://github.com/orgs/aspnet/projects/2 My preference is to:
@Pilchie and @anurse do you know a way to move a project between organizations? If we're agreed, could you do that and the AspNetCore-Internal repo move? |
/fyi @ericstj @nguerrera @mmitche |
Yes we've represented this the same way since 2.0. |
@dougbu I don't see a way to move projects between orgs. That's probably because projects can generally only contain issues from repos in the same org, so it gets a little complicated. We could open a new project and work on migrating issues. As for moving AspNetCore-Internal, I'm fine with that but don't have the necessary permissions in the dotnet org to do so. |
I don't either, but @jaredpar could probably do it for us. |
Yes I can do it. Can someone positively state they want me to move AspNetCore-Internal to the dotnet org? The language so far is "i'm fine with it". Want to verify before I do the move. |
Please go ahead and move AspNetCore-Internal to the dotnet org whenever it's convenient to you, and let me know when you are done. |
Assuming it should be named aspnetcore-internal (casing change) to match the other moves? |
Yes, sounds good to me. |
The transfer has happened. There is one new team though we hadn't ported yet: aspdoi. Do you need that ported? Seems that aspnet-push had enough overlap that this shouldn't be a problem. |
Thanks! For It's there for mentioning, not for permissions, so we can do that on our own. |
As 3.1.3 has been released, should this be moved to a later milestone? |
The issue was resolved in 3.1.3, so should be fine to keep that as its milestone - I guess I just forgot to close it 🤦♂ |
After the (long) discussion in #18364 about CoreFx package versions where we only need ref/ assemblies, should also pin the following to their
.0
versions in 'release/3.0' and 'release/3.1' branches:(We do not seem to need ref/ assemblies from other packages shown in https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/search?q=isnetcoreappref&unscoped_q=isnetcoreappref @ericstj please confirm those properties are the same for 3.0, 3.1 and 5.0 -- GitHub search doesn't help much.)
Extensions
release/3.0
- [release/3.0] Pin dependency on Microsoft.Win32.Registry extensions#2899release/3.1
- [release/3.1] Pin dependency on 2 CoreFx packages extensions#2900AspNetCore
release/3.0
- [release/3.0] Pin dependency on 2 CoreFx packages #18541release/3.1
- [release/3.1] Pin dependency on 3 CoreFx packages #18542EFCore, Aspnetcore-Tooling, Blazor, and EF6 don't depend on any of these packages, so nothing is needed there
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: