Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider searching for ROS<char> variants of TryParse in RDF #44603

Open
halter73 opened this issue Oct 17, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Consider searching for ROS<char> variants of TryParse in RDF #44603

halter73 opened this issue Oct 17, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
area-minimal Includes minimal APIs, endpoint filters, parameter binding, request delegate generator etc enhancement This issue represents an ask for new feature or an enhancement to an existing one investigate
Milestone

Comments

@halter73
Copy link
Member

We should consider searching for ReadOnlySpan<char> overloads of TryParse in RequestDelegateFactory to support types like IPNetwork. Context: #8606 (comment)

@halter73 halter73 added feature area-web-frameworks *DEPRECATED* This label is deprecated in favor of the area-mvc and area-minimal labels labels Oct 17, 2022
@rafikiassumani-msft rafikiassumani-msft added this to the Backlog milestone Oct 20, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 20, 2022

We've moved this issue to the Backlog milestone. This means that it is not going to be worked on for the coming release. We will reassess the backlog following the current release and consider this item at that time. To learn more about our issue management process and to have better expectation regarding different types of issues you can read our Triage Process.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 20, 2022

Thanks for contacting us.

We're moving this issue to the .NET 8 Planning milestone for future evaluation / consideration. We would like to keep this around to collect more feedback, which can help us with prioritizing this work. We will re-evaluate this issue, during our next planning meeting(s).
If we later determine, that the issue has no community involvement, or it's very rare and low-impact issue, we will close it - so that the team can focus on more important and high impact issues.
To learn more about what to expect next and how this issue will be handled you can read more about our triage process here.

@Tratcher
Copy link
Member

IPNetwork may become obsolete. dotnet/runtime#79946

@mitchdenny
Copy link
Member

Sounds like there will be an alternative type though (e.g. IPSubnet).

@captainsafia captainsafia added enhancement This issue represents an ask for new feature or an enhancement to an existing one and removed feature labels May 5, 2023
@captainsafia captainsafia added area-minimal Includes minimal APIs, endpoint filters, parameter binding, request delegate generator etc and removed area-web-frameworks *DEPRECATED* This label is deprecated in favor of the area-mvc and area-minimal labels labels Jun 20, 2023
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the pending-ci-rerun When assigned to a PR indicates that the CI checks should be rerun label Feb 6, 2024
@wtgodbe wtgodbe removed the pending-ci-rerun When assigned to a PR indicates that the CI checks should be rerun label Feb 6, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the pending-ci-rerun When assigned to a PR indicates that the CI checks should be rerun label Feb 6, 2024
@wtgodbe wtgodbe removed the pending-ci-rerun When assigned to a PR indicates that the CI checks should be rerun label Feb 13, 2024
@dotnet dotnet deleted a comment from dotnet-policy-service bot Feb 13, 2024
@dotnet dotnet deleted a comment from dotnet-policy-service bot Feb 13, 2024
@captainsafia captainsafia modified the milestones: .NET 8 Planning, Backlog Mar 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-minimal Includes minimal APIs, endpoint filters, parameter binding, request delegate generator etc enhancement This issue represents an ask for new feature or an enhancement to an existing one investigate
Projects
No open projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants