Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Perf] Linux/x64: 2 Regressions on 1/31/2024 11:26:48 AM #28600

Open
performanceautofiler bot opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

[Perf] Linux/x64: 2 Regressions on 1/31/2024 11:26:48 AM #28600

performanceautofiler bot opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@performanceautofiler
Copy link

performanceautofiler bot commented Feb 6, 2024

Run Information

Name Value
Architecture x64
OS ubuntu 22.04
Queue TigerUbuntu
Baseline ca46ae5e88965d284a5ebdda29c9e40604812d09
Compare 3bf9beecd5f68a59fc407488ce8120ee3d4240c7
Diff Diff
Configs CompilationMode:wasm, RunKind:micro

Regressions in System.Numerics.Tests.Perf_VectorConvert

Benchmark Baseline Test Test/Base Test Quality Edge Detector Baseline IR Compare IR IR Ratio
28.28 μs 32.11 μs 1.14 0.00 False
28.17 μs 32.09 μs 1.14 0.00 False

graph
graph
Test Report

Repro

General Docs link: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/main/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md

git clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
python3 .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net8.0 --filter 'System.Numerics.Tests.Perf_VectorConvert*'

Payloads

Baseline
Compare

System.Numerics.Tests.Perf_VectorConvert.Narrow_uint

ETL Files

Histogram

JIT Disasms

System.Numerics.Tests.Perf_VectorConvert.Narrow_int

ETL Files

Histogram

JIT Disasms

Docs

Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository
Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository

@radekdoulik
Copy link
Member

@BrzVlad this is dotnet/runtime#97514

@BrzVlad
Copy link
Member

BrzVlad commented Feb 8, 2024

Tested both linux-amd64 and wasm and couldn't reproduce regression. Probably this is just noise.

@kg
Copy link
Member

kg commented Mar 15, 2024

This is resolved now, fwiw
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants