Improving P95+ latency #37534
Labels
area-Meta
Epic
Groups multiple user stories. Can be grouped under a theme.
tenet-performance
Performance related issue
Milestone
Improving P95+ latency
We see an increasing number of large internet-facing sites and services being hosted on .NET. While there is a lot of legitimate focus on the requests per second (RPS) metric, we find that very few big site owners ask us about that or even need to satisfy throughput approaching 1000 RPS (1000 RPS == 86M requests per day). We hear a lot more about latency, specifically about improving P95 or P99 latency. Often, the number of machines or cores that are provisioned for (and biggest cost driver of) a site are chosen based on achieving a specific P95 metric (for example, 200ms), as opposed to a lower P50 metric (for example, 50ms). We think of latency as being the true “money metric”.
We want .NET to be a platform that makes it cheaper to host your applications with each new release. In order to achieve that, it's important that latency is both good (low) but also predictable. That's the whole point of measuring P95+ latency. We have increased our focus on predictably consistent performance, reducing performance cliffs and outliers, with an emphasis on P95+ latency.
An equally important theme is predictable performance. Some of these epics are more related to that, then specifically targeting P95 latency. We're going to be a bit lazy here, and mix the two topics.
GC
Reduce GC pause times in specific situations, like Array.Copy, Array.Sort or object unboxing
Runtime
Libraries
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: