-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support Dev inner loop improvements in CoreCLR VM #45629
Comments
Tagging subscribers to this area: @tommcdon Issue DetailsContributes to dotnet/core/issues/5511 OverviewOur goal is to provide a consistent Hot Reload experience in .NET Core across all platforms, architectures, and workloads as described in dotnet/core/issues/5511. Today, code edits can be made at runtime and applied to running processes using ReJIT and Edit and Continue . The typical dev inner loop involves making code edit changes, building, debugging, then making new edits. Edit and Continue can apply code edits while the debugger is attached and given that it conforms to a set of constraints (defined here). Our desire is to improve the inner loop and by allowing code edits to applied at runtime and support multiple platforms/architectures. Ideally this work will involve using the same/similar API's being used for Mono Method Body Replacement.
|
will mono support it in jit mode? |
Please see #44806 for the mono hot reload work |
Hot Reload is now enabled on .NET Core and Mono, closing |
Contributes to dotnet/core/issues/5511
Overview
Our goal is to provide a consistent dev inner loop experience in .NET Core across all platforms, architectures, and workloads. Today, code edits can be made at runtime and applied to running processes using ReJIT and Edit and Continue . The typical dev inner loop involves making code edit changes, building, debugging, then making new edits. Edit and Continue can apply code edits while the debugger is attached and given that it conforms to a set of constraints (defined here). Our desire is to improve the inner loop and by allowing code edits to applied at runtime and support multiple platforms/architectures. Ideally this work will involve using the same/similar API's being used for Mono Method Body Replacement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: