Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

review SubtleCrypto fallback scenarios #69741

Closed
Tracked by #40074
lewing opened this issue May 24, 2022 · 7 comments
Closed
Tracked by #40074

review SubtleCrypto fallback scenarios #69741

lewing opened this issue May 24, 2022 · 7 comments
Labels
arch-wasm WebAssembly architecture area-System.Security
Milestone

Comments

@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented May 24, 2022

Once #65966 lands we will still fall back to the managed implementation if the page is not served with CORS headers. Should there be a user indication of this state, and if so, through what mechanism.

@lewing lewing added the arch-wasm WebAssembly architecture label May 24, 2022
@lewing lewing added this to the 7.0.0 milestone May 24, 2022
@dotnet-issue-labeler
Copy link

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this issue. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 24, 2022

Tagging subscribers to 'arch-wasm': @lewing
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Once #65966 lands we will still fall back to the managed implementation if the page is not served with CORS headers. Should there be a user indication of this state, and if so, through what mechanism.

Author: lewing
Assignees: -
Labels:

arch-wasm

Milestone: 7.0.0

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 24, 2022

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-security, @vcsjones
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Once #65966 lands we will still fall back to the managed implementation if the page is not served with CORS headers. Should there be a user indication of this state, and if so, through what mechanism.

Author: lewing
Assignees: -
Labels:

arch-wasm, area-System.Security

Milestone: 7.0.0

@radical
Copy link
Member

radical commented Aug 11, 2022

@SteveSandersonMS does anything need to be done for 7.0 here? If so, then what should be done?

@radical
Copy link
Member

radical commented Aug 12, 2022

Moving to 8.0 . @SteveSandersonMS @javiercn Feel free to move this to 7.0, if you feel something needs to be done here.

@radical radical modified the milestones: 7.0.0, 8.0.0 Aug 12, 2022
@SteveSandersonMS
Copy link
Member

@radical @lewing In light of #73858, should this issue just be closed, or do we need to move any of it into that tracking issue?

@radical
Copy link
Member

radical commented Aug 15, 2022

Yes, we can close this. thanks:)

@radical radical closed this as completed Aug 15, 2022
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 14, 2022
@jeffhandley jeffhandley modified the milestones: 8.0.0, 7.0.0 Jan 17, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
arch-wasm WebAssembly architecture area-System.Security
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants