-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Assertion failed 'add != nullptr' during 'Calculate stack level slots' #93885
Labels
arch-x86
area-CodeGen-coreclr
CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
Comments
kunalspathak
added
arch-x86
area-CodeGen-coreclr
CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
labels
Oct 23, 2023
Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch Issue Detailsusing System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
using System.Runtime.Intrinsics;
using System.Runtime.Intrinsics.X86;
using System.Numerics;
public class TestClass
{
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
}
}
/*
--------- Test ---------
Environment:
set DOTNET_TieredCompilation=1
set DOTNET_EnableSSE2=0
set DOTNET_JitStress=1
Assert failure(PID 26368 [0x00006700], Thread: 41300 [0xa154]): Assertion failed 'add != nullptr' in 'System.Runtime.InteropServices.MemoryMarshal:GetArrayDataReference[System.__Canon](System.__Canon[]):byref' during 'Calculate stack level slots' (IL size 7; hash 0x9d714931; Tier0)
File: E:\git\runtime2\src\coreclr\jit\stacklevelsetter.cpp Line: 173
Image: e:\git\runtime2\artifacts\tests\coreclr\windows.x86.checked\tests\Core_Root\CoreRun.exe
*/ Related to #93371? @AndyAyersMS
|
Dup of #93640 |
Yes, quite likely. |
Ah, see it wasn't my change after all. |
ghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Nov 22, 2023
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
arch-x86
area-CodeGen-coreclr
CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
Related to #93371? @AndyAyersMS
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: