Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Epic: Support optional SDK workload templates #2429

Closed
6 tasks done
genalt opened this issue Jul 30, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed
6 tasks done

Epic: Support optional SDK workload templates #2429

genalt opened this issue Jul 30, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
Epic Groups multiple user stories. Can be grouped under a theme. triaged The issue was evaluated by the triage team, placed on correct area, next action defined.

Comments

@genalt
Copy link
Contributor

genalt commented Jul 30, 2020

Workloads overview spec

This Epic tracks the work needed for the Template Engine to support Optional Workload templates.

Testing phase

We need to complete the Tests:

  • for the integration with real Optional SDK Workloads installation.
  • perf test for installation/uninstallation (invoke the API call on every run, invoke cache cleaning on every run). The perf test should take into account number of templates installed in a system.
@genalt genalt added triaged The issue was evaluated by the triage team, placed on correct area, next action defined. Epic Groups multiple user stories. Can be grouped under a theme. labels Jul 30, 2020
@genalt genalt changed the title Epic: Support optional SDK workload Epic: Support optional SDK workload templates Jul 30, 2020
@donJoseLuis donJoseLuis assigned donJoseLuis and genalt and unassigned donJoseLuis Jul 30, 2020
@genalt genalt closed this as completed Aug 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Epic Groups multiple user stories. Can be grouped under a theme. triaged The issue was evaluated by the triage team, placed on correct area, next action defined.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants