Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Time Labels Color(s) #10

Closed
nelsonic opened this issue Oct 7, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Time Labels Color(s) #10

nelsonic opened this issue Oct 7, 2016 · 6 comments
Labels
discuss Share your constructive thoughts on how to make progress with this issue

Comments

@nelsonic
Copy link
Member

nelsonic commented Oct 7, 2016

At present our Time (estimation) Labels are different colors: https://github.com/dwyl/labels/labels
time-labels-colors

This makes it hard difficult to scan through a list of issues e.g: https://github.com/emfoundation/ce100-app/milestone/3 and see which ones have a time estimate label applied.

@iteles please remind us why the labels have different colors... was it to signify a "scale" e.g. darker pink is more time...?

for the record I think they should all be the same color so its easy to glance at the list of issues and see Time Estimate. or if we are going for a "range", we should first agree on what "levels" of time estimation we are going to do and then could go on http://www.color-hex.com/color/f7c6c7 and select different (but still v. similar and thus "scannable") tones of the same color for the "spectrum of effort"...

@nelsonic nelsonic added the discuss Share your constructive thoughts on how to make progress with this issue label Oct 7, 2016
@iteles
Copy link
Member

iteles commented Oct 7, 2016

The thinking behind having two shades of pink for the time labels was so that tasks under half a day were easily identifiable should the person wanting to contribute have a smaller time block on their hands.

It doesn't seem to be working though, let's get it sorted. 👍

@nelsonic
Copy link
Member Author

nelsonic commented Oct 7, 2016

@iteles stories/issues/tasks should only be estimated when they are going to be included in the milestone (or started immediately) preferably by the people/person who is going to do the work.

If people never start working on another issue/task before estimating it again, I really don't mind what colors are used for the labels. The reason I opened this issue was because I see milestones ("sprints") with quite a few issues which are unestimated ...

image

@iteles
Copy link
Member

iteles commented Oct 18, 2016

This has been changed in this repo. Could you please check and close this issue @nelsonic ?

It should be noted that as a person who has to answer a lot of client questions on timelines, I find it incredibly useful to have a quick understanding of which tasks are 'quick' tasks (under and hour) and which ones extend into half a day plus.

I was in the situation today where when sprint planning I was able to quickly scan the backlog and pick out a couple of small but high value features quickly to add more value to the sprint (we'd estimated the next highest priority in the backlog and it was too large for the time available in the sprint so I was looking for smaller pieces). It also allows me to have a good idea at a glance of how full a sprint really is (lots of dark pinks vs lots of light pinks).

I'm happy to be outvoted on this one as it seems people find it more unhelpful than helpful, but wanted to document the above for future reference once the issue is closed.

@nelsonic
Copy link
Member Author

@iteles I prefer the lighter pink.
dark-pink-with-black-text

Dark pink with black text is not great. 😕

@iteles
Copy link
Member

iteles commented Oct 21, 2016

Done.

screen shot 2016-10-21 at 23 00 52

@nelsonic
Copy link
Member Author

I should have phrased that better... but thanks for changing them. 👍

@nelsonic nelsonic mentioned this issue Oct 22, 2016
@iteles iteles closed this as completed Feb 2, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discuss Share your constructive thoughts on how to make progress with this issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants