Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deps: Bump nano to 10.1.3 to avoid axios <1.6.0 #13328

Conversation

Torbjorn-Svensson
Copy link
Contributor

axios 1.6.0 fixes CVE-2023-45857
(https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-AXIOS-6032459).

What it does

Bumps nano dependency to 10.1.3 to avoid indirect dependency on vulnerable axios@<1.6.0.

How to test

Not sure how to test. yarn test fails for me with and without this bump.
I have just bumped the dependency and verified that the electron build starts using details described in the quickstart guide

Follow-ups

Review checklist

Reminder for reviewers

Contributed by STMicroelectronics

@Torbjorn-Svensson
Copy link
Contributor Author

@JonasHelming / @tsmaeder: Any update on this PR?

@tsmaeder
Copy link
Contributor

@Torbjorn-Svensson sorry...this one dropped between the cracks. Could you rebase the PR, please?

axios 1.6.0 fixes CVE-2023-45857
(https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-AXIOS-6032459).

Contributed by STMicroelectronics

Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com>
@Torbjorn-Svensson Torbjorn-Svensson force-pushed the pr/bump-to-nano-10.1.3-CVE-2023-45857 branch from d6dac1c to 626cd7b Compare February 21, 2024 13:21
@Torbjorn-Svensson
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Torbjorn-Svensson sorry...this one dropped between the cracks. Could you rebase the PR, please?

Rebased on top of 120a822.

@tsmaeder tsmaeder merged commit ac08b27 into eclipse-theia:master Feb 21, 2024
14 checks passed
@jfaltermeier jfaltermeier added this to the 1.47.0 milestone Feb 29, 2024
This was referenced Mar 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants