Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide bytesize filtering capability #1115

Closed
ppf2 opened this issue Mar 5, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Provide bytesize filtering capability #1115

ppf2 opened this issue Mar 5, 2016 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label Stalled

Comments

@ppf2
Copy link
Member

ppf2 commented Mar 5, 2016

Discussed with the LS team earlier today. There are cases where the events coming in can be of varied sizes, from the regular 3-4Kb per event, to something that is potentially huge like 100+Mb (eg. application log dump of a xml response). While some users may be able to simply drop the events, some users do have to retain them for compliancy. One optimization idea being implemented is to create a custom ruby filter in LS to calculate the bytesize of the message field of an event, and send it through to separate topics/lists in a queuing system and have separate LS indexers to handle abnormally large events and have other LS indexers handle the regular sized events. @suyograo suggests filing an enhancement request for beats for it is best to perform such byte-size filtering further upstream.

@ruflin
Copy link
Contributor

ruflin commented Mar 7, 2016

It seems like there are several options that could be pursued her from the beats side:

A third option could be routing of events to different instances of LS. Currently from my point of view I don't feel like that is something that should happen on the beats side as when it comes to sending events we should keep the complexity to a minimum on the beats side.

@monicasarbu
Copy link
Contributor

This should be easily done with generic filtering feature: #451

@ppf2
Copy link
Member Author

ppf2 commented Nov 10, 2016

Any progress on this? This will help users who want the ability to filter out, tag and route occasional large/gigantic events closer to the source.

@botelastic
Copy link

botelastic bot commented Jul 9, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@botelastic botelastic bot added Stalled needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label labels Jul 9, 2020
@botelastic
Copy link

botelastic bot commented Jul 9, 2020

This issue doesn't have a Team:<team> label.

@botelastic botelastic bot closed this as completed Aug 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label Stalled
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants